🔗 Share this article

It has been described as among the biggest scams of its kind in the UK.

A total of 14 defendants have been sentenced for their part in a £28m plot to swindle in excess of 3,500 timeshare investors.

The affected individuals were keen to get out of long-standing timeshare contracts and sought out assistance.

Most were from 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them lost more than £10,000, and a single victim transferred more than £80,000.

Those affected were exposed to high-pressure presentations extending for six hours. They were left out of pocket, possessing worthless fake "credits" and continued to be locked into expensive timeshare contracts they could no longer use.

The Business At the Heart of the Deception

The company at the centre of the fraud was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected customers' funds to support the proprietors' opulent way of life of exclusive education, high-end properties and private jets.

The leader at the helm of the firm, Mark Rowe, was given a 90-month prison term in January for fraudulent conspiracy.

Recently, his spouse one of the co-defendants was part of the concluding cases to learn their fate.

She received a 24-month suspended jail sentence at Southwark Crown Court after pleading guilty to money laundering.

This has been a lengthy process and marks a huge win for the people who spoke out, the law enforcement and the Crown.

How the Investigation Began

I first heard about the company came in the summer of 2016. The position was in the research department of a media outlet, creating current affairs programmes.

A colleague mentioned that his mother had taken over the ownership of a timeshare apartment in the Spanish coast and, after decades of vacations, had begun looking to get out of the deal.

It should be noted how popular holiday ownership had evolved with British holidaymakers in the last decades of the 20th century.

Holiday ownership allowed individuals to occupy the same accommodation each season, or swap their vacation periods with additional holders who had apartments in different locations. About 600,000 vacation seekers seized that option.

The initial boom was accompanied by a lot of reports about dishonest operators mis-selling units. They appeared frequently on investigative TV programmes.

The common holiday ownership agreement bound owners for many years.

By 2016, those owners who had experienced their guaranteed place in the resort for decades were getting older, and a significant number were attempting to say farewell to their holiday properties.

Several had declining mobility and found it difficult to access their units. Some just felt they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And a portion had died, in frequent situations leaving their family members to assume the deals - including their regular contributions and upkeep costs.

The Investigation Unfolds

And that's where the friend's mum had ended up. She searched the web for solutions and found the organization, a firm whose website promised to release her from her contract.

However, having paid a fee and scheduled a consultation with them, her family had doubts.

Further research revealed hundreds of people claiming they had handed over cash and got nothing out of it. In fact, they had been left out of pocket. Substantial amounts.

The investigative unit started looking into what was occurring. It was rapidly apparent that there were dubious individuals working within the holiday ownership market.

One lawyer had hundreds of individual complaints preparing to take action against SMT.

We spoke to people who had dealt with the organization and they each reported similar experiences. They assumed the firm would buy their property off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no re-sale value.

In place of that, they were persuaded - actually coerced - to commit further cash investing in "Monster Rewards", linked to the business's umbrella group, the parent organization.

The precise definition was rather ambiguous. They sounded like a kind of currency, giving access to cheaper vacations and benefits and retail offers.

And they were seemingly "tradable" with additional holders, some time down the line.

Investing money up front now would result in an long-term benefit that would cover the firm's costs and allow the timeshare holder ahead financially, released finally from their pesky contract.

An unrealistic promise? Well, yes.

A 'Misleading Scheme'

Based on these descriptions were correct, this was a major deception.

The technique is termed a "misleading sales."

Someone - here SMT - "attracts the consumer by advertising a specific service and then claim it is unavailable, steering the individual in the direction of an alternative, lesser option.

This is against the law. Equipped with all the testimony we had gathered, we presented the rationale to secretly film one of the company's meetings.

The process requires dedication, work, and compelling reasons for why this is the only way to obtain the evidence necessary to confirm deceptive practices.

Armed with that permission, our small team set up a consultation with one of the organization's staff in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Pretending to be a member of the public hoping to assist his parent released from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement